>>54391
We all agree to not engage with things we don't want to see, and the mod team enfurces that by disallowing people to furce things onto others through spam etc.
I think you bring up a good point, if someone who draws NSFW wants to engage with the 'foo they need to put effurt into separating their NSFW. A person seeing your art on the 'foo should never be able to find your nsfw stuff unless they go out of their way to research you etc.
>Seeing his twitter, then seeing him post on here
Well the thing is he barely posts here anyways, and the 'foo doesn't control the people that post here. The admins probably shouldn't be so open arms because they silently promote his stuff and some people don't want to see it.
>>54392
We do have rules about it, mod team doesn't enfurce based on content you post elsewhere unless it breaks rule 1 or 3
>>54393
>Someone was bound to talk about it considering that he's somewhat of a known artist here
fair
>>54395
kek but seriosuly this would be terrible
IMO public shame does little good, and all it does is create animosity and senseless hate. An artist must genuinely wish to stop drawing NSFW, otherwise no amount of shame is going to make them change.