>>69387
Agreed. I must admit I would be tempted to pick something replicable and profitable- but you would be turning yourself into an automata, putting in man hours to produce things can't even be sure are your own creations and using a talent that isn't yours. I suppose if you have absolutely no desire to develop a skill or to create art that doesn't sound terrible, but I think I'd find that unbearable.
>>69362 (OP)
You know, this is basically the "AI" "debate" (besides all current "AI" generated material being shitty slop made by indians and boomers)- one day (some say that day is already here) there will be a machine that can "perfectly emulate" an art style from any artist IT knows. Who would you pick? The only real difference with the AI is you don't have to spend hours or days moving your hand.