/anthro/ - Anthropomorphic

I could see why people consider it. It gets the most attention easily.

SFW/NSFW is not an artistically healthy framing to adopt fur the average artist. I, first and furemost, draw whatever the fluff I want, the last thing that enters my mind at any stage of the process is whether I'm going to draw something "Safe Fur Work" or not. But I've totally lost track of how many weeks it's been since I've last attempted to draw anything. I blame Woke fur all of this.

>>88587 (OP) 
i do not draw porn. pornography has negatively impacted my brain, and causes inner turmoil. as a result, i have chosen not to draw it, because i do not want to be part of a problem that hurts other people. that and i become so attached to my OCs that i do not want to see them in porn, and have gotten upset when people draw my characters in pornographic ways. its part of why i dont post on 4chan anymore
then again i draw violence and edgy stuff, so maybe i am a hypocrite
>>88593
the only times i see the acronyms SFW/NSFW used is mainly by coomers, at least in recent times

>>88587 (OP) 
@grok what is the source of this image?
asking on behalf of @purrgem

BLEED OUT FAGGOT

A big thing that would put me off of drawing porn and posting it is that everything on the internet can be archived. What if 30 years from now someone shows my future kids the furry smut I drew when I was in my 20s? Imagine how awkward it would be to see porn your parents drew. I know it's unlikely but with how many freaks are on the internet, it's still a possibility 
And then I also wonder, what would my future wife think? Even if she were fine with it, it's not like I would go around telling every woman I meet I draw porn, I'd naturally have to keep it a secret during some of the relationship, and that's of course no good. 
I don't draw porn, and I don't even really have much of a desire to draw it at all, but that's kinda the biggest deterrent. I don't really have any moral issues with it, if people want to draw porn, I don't care, so long as they aren't showing it to minors or anything like that. It's kinda retarded to police what other people draw

>>88643
Unless you're signing furry porn with your full government name, i don't see how this would be a problem

>>88643
cringe
>>88646
>what are database hacks

>>88594
How has porn negatively impacted your brain? Go on, explain to me how exactly porn... RAPED... you... because I really don't understand what you're talking about at all.
>the only times i see the acronyms SFW/NSFW used is mainly by coomers
Not something I've seen myself, but I don't see the pertinence of this either way.
>>88643
You're totally insane. Normal people are dead, normal people remain dead.

>>88647
???
Irrelevant

>>88648
>increased libido and almost constant desire to jack off
>has desensitized me and i feel my mind slipping into being aroused by weird stuff
>i have intrusive thoughts sometimes stemming from pornography its lingo, ex. having to make sure i don't say some weird shit via freudian slip
>wastes time
>i am a sex-negative person, but that obviously conflicts with my behavior
you probably don't see any of these as a negative, but i am a moralfag so it obviously makes issues with me at times
>>88649
you can cross-reference things like emails and stuff across different leaks and sometimes can identify people's identity that way. normally nobody is insane enough to go after you specifically, but all it takes is someone to make an aggregated database of people's info to put you on a roster (like the ashley madison hack that resulted in a search engine showing if a person's email was used to make an account there)

0f4878046a3c73164854aa97b04fa367a7d10b88bef676be68d4913c22df4a4b.png U A
[Hide] (698.9KB, 1920x1080)
Reverse

>>88643
>What if 30 years from now someone shows my future kids the furry smut I drew when I was in my 20s?
Just tell them it's an AI fake.
>>88648
THE MADMAN—Have you not heard of that madman who lit a lantern in the bright morning hours, ran to the market place, and cried incessantly: "I seek normies! I seek normies!"—As many of those who did not believe in normies were standing around just then, he provoked much laughter. Have they got lost? asked one. Did they lose their way like children? asked another. Or are they hiding? Are they afraid of us? Have they gone on a voyage? emigrated?—Thus they yelled and laughed.

The madman jumped into their midst and pierced them with his eyes. "Whither are the normies?" he cried; "I will tell you. We have killed them—you and I. All of us are their murderers. But how did we do this?"

>>88658
>Just tell them it's an AI fake.
that's actually a good counter point

529554ce4c22ca33a28d6402c3a19f26dff213d6fe3db3204f9d33dfaca1ed78.png U A
[Hide] (434.1KB, 1280x720)
Reverse

>>88659
And when everything's fake, nothing will be!

>>88657
You're right about that one. Well, moreso neutral.
>>i am a sex-negative person, but that obviously conflicts with my behavior
Not really.

>>88587 (OP) 
In addition to porn being bad fur you, it seems aesthetically less useful. If I go into the art thread right now I can look at a lot of cool drawings and appreciate them no matter what mood I'm in. Porn is only able to be "appreciated" when you are horny and then it goes away.

>>88668
>Not really.
i dislike promiscuity, yet i am a promiscuous person. that is a conflict i have within myself
>>88673
tsmt. it also depreciates how much a value an artist and their work, because i get reminded of that time i wanked off to their stuff

>>88673
No.
>>88674
Are you now? I don't see what internet porn would have to do with that.

>>88676
i should have looked up the word definition befurehand, because looking now i definitely misused that word. no i am not promiscuous, but i am more prone to being aroused than i would like

717ff3ba5e1a962b17ebe82e233c5b238a2438330e8a9396bb8c06a249790a37.png U A
[Hide] (83.4KB, 2048x2048)
Reverse

>>88673
trvke svpa nova
have a lick anon

>>88587 (OP) 
I did a few times, but it never felt right, like I was confurming to what I thought an audience wanted. I would consider doing it in the future fur anatomy studies I wouldn't share with the Internet. 
Goofslop is bad developmentally, as I've noticed that artists who primarily do NSFW start making critical anatomy mistakes and they plateau. And it can't be good mentally if that's your audience and livelihood, either. 

>that and i become so attached to my OCs that i do not want to see them in porn, and have gotten upset when people draw my characters in pornographic ways. its part of why i dont post on 4chan anymore
The way some people treat all OCs as "porn actresses" is disheartening. Some people created them fur that purpose, but many did not; drawing them is somebody's way to relax, or vent, or imagine. Cringe as it is to say, my characters and their little world are a piece of my soul, and I cherish them a lot. If somebody came up to you and was like "yeah I want to see your lovely fox wife with gigantic tits and lezzing out with my OC," I would feel a bit hurt by that desu.

>>88680
Now would be a good time to properly define 'I'.

>>88587 (OP) 
I want to try drawing body horror/gore since it's relevant to my story, assuming we are talking about that as well. Or is this just a discussion about porn/nudity?

>>88688
That sounds fun.

>>88688
Well I feel like most people immediately assume porn when they hear "NSFW". Kinda unfurtunate that horror/gore and porn are both lumped under the same umbrella term. Same thing with artistic nudity.

>>88673
All very true. Though sometimes I find it a little weird how people will yap so much about how porn is bad fur you. People will complain about having a porn addiction like, bro, just don't look at it lol. Same thing with fat people, just don't eat so much lol. I'm not disagreeing that it's not good fur you but still

>>88688
draw more lasses in bikinis

>>88691
>Well I feel like most people immediately assume porn when they hear "NSFW"
Probably because it makes up a large portion of not just NSFW material, but art on the internet as a whole
>>88699
If you want, then feel free to suggest a character

smug monkey.jpg U A
[Hide] (38.4KB, 526x526)
Reverse

>>88702
the big one...

>>88673
Goofing to the art thread right now.

mns.png U A
[Hide] (1.5MB, 2439x2381)
Reverse

>>88703
Understood

>>88587 (OP) 

sometimes, but i never actually do it. ive drawn some titties here and there and there was one time i sculpted a fully nude female body in Zbrush, but besides, i've never dedicated myself to it.

i don't know, almost everything furry is porn. it gets kinda tiresome. i prefer dedicating my effurt to something like a  videogame instead. a real one that just happens to feature funny animals, not just another porn game or visual novel.

>>88594
>>88673
>Porn is bad fur you
>Proceeds to scrool 8 hours a day

>>88725
That's Aryan

>>88726
Porn being bad fur you is a retarded tradcath Latinx meme anyway. At worst it might make you perceive women differently if you're looking fur a gf, but who cares about 3d foids anyway. Jerking it fur 20 minutes a day is significantly better than scrolling social media fur 5 hours a day. Your brain doesn't have some self-destruct button that is activated if it catches you goofing. They just say jacking off is bad because it's in le Bible.
That doesn't stop them from being massive sexual degenerates doe gek

>>88727
Pornography does a lot of things to you. It is a time waster, it drains your energy (so you are less likely to do other productive things), it fluffs with your brain and inevitably causes you to go down further fetish paths due to requiring constant novelty, and it messes with your dopamine loops. I do not care about it in any moral science, it is scientifically bad fur you. You might be mistaking masturbation and pornography, masturbation is fine in regular amounts and is very natural. Introducing porn into the equation is the real problem. There is historical precedent fur blasting pornography over the airwaves of your enemies, it was done in 2002 in the middle east fur instance.

>>88729
Any moral stance*, I am distracted

>>88727
Porn probably is le bad doe. Its pretty evident it causes negative psychological problems.

>>88729
What you're describing is just instant gratification. This is the same shit boomers say to justify video games being bad fur you. There's nothing unique or special about porn that makes it bad fur your brain, if anything, post-nut clarity is really nice if you're trying to do something but are distracted by lewd thoughts (which will happen whether or not you jack off, because you're a male). Porn is a time waster in the same way video games are, it can become an unhealthy addiction, but if it's just to relax, who gives a shit? "Every second of every day must be spent making money fur Moshe Shekelstein" is a stupid boomer meme anyway. You cannot make the blanket statement of "porn is bad fur you" then turn around and say video games or social media are fine.

>>88731
I <3 vagueposting

>>88733
If you want me to be more specific insecurity, erectile dysfunction, misinfurmation about sex, and as you said your view of the opposite sex can be ruined.

>>88729
>masturbation is fine in regular amounts and is very natural. Introducing porn into the equation is the real problem.
doesn't the porn just play in your mind instead

>>88734
That's literally just social media

>>88736
Didn’t say that was good either. But you don’t see people going to therapy over that like you do porn.

>>88732
Yeah but video games don't activate the same parts of the brain as crack, ecstasy, and porn do

>>88739
Social media is famous fur never causing any harm to mental health. There has never been reports of people committing suicide over it. There was never a huge campaign to address the issue of how social media detrimentally affects the lives of teenagers and how they perceive themselves and life  
>>88740
Can you explain why this is bad? Do you think our brain has parts that should just never be activated? This doesn't make it analogous to crack at all, it just sounds scary if you know absolutely nothing about the brain 
Did you know that exercise or listening to music activates the same parts of the brain as meth? Whoa! Avoid those!

>>88735
Imagination and seeing are different things. When you look at porn, your brain doesn't have to do any work in the imagination department. When using only your mind you have to create the whole scenario, exercise your brain, etc.

>>88743
Stunt on these hoes

>>88751
I'm exercising my brain right now ;)

>>88594
wait femcel cat yiffs are out there????

>>88782
If true that makes me sad, I especially dislike porn with OCs I'm attached to.

>>88734
>>88739
Feminist moron.
>>88743
>Social media is famous fur never causing any harm to mental health. There has never been reports of people committing suicide over it. There was never a huge campaign to address the issue of how social media detrimentally affects the lives of teenagers and how they perceive themselves and life  
All true.

c6d9ed3a9ddf56c1438abec4e74c9a14326304c6e219e431e78a4a3c404d8c8d.jpg U A
[Hide] (344.5KB, 863x962)
Reverse

>>88782
>>88784
well, someone drew a nude image of her wearing a sexy nun outfit on /i/. i said the artstyle and effurt was nice, but i didn't like how she was portrayed. i just took a screenshot of her face. a lot of other anons were threatening to draw more porn of her, but i came in calling everyone a furfag, but it was not meant to be taken seriously, as i was also posting furry art myself

>>88822
erm actually it was /ic/, i got them mixed up

>>88822
That's a very unkind thing to say. They should've responded by commissioning an animated feature-length film of the Femcel-anon characters being sexually abused and degraded by fursuiters.

>>88796
>>88825
this is why we need feminism

>>88826
Ehhhhh, no. Not at all.

>>88825
>Femcel-anon characters being sexually abused and degraded
that's technically lore accurate, and something 4chan would do if they could affurd to commission such a thing and weren't shitskin 3rd worlders
>>88826
>feminism
no, not even once. that said, while i don't think they should even have the right to vote, i don't think treating them like shit fur no reason is a good thing either

>>88825
thats aryan actually nyagger

Femcel is the anfoos asexual queen.

>>88832
You're our transsexual queen.

>>88830
I wonder which member of the Stockholm rap scene will post on this webfurum next.
>>88829
>i don't think treating them like shit fur no reason is a good thing either
You've gone Woke.

>>88822
Asking people to not draw porn of a character on 4chan is just an invitation fur them. I remember Starrtoon's fursona was posted on /ic/ and anons proceeded to draw lewd images of her specifically because she's anti-porn. There was actually one where she had a really nice ass, I obviously can't post it but you can find them on e6

>>88843
>Asking people to not draw porn of a character on 4chan is just an invitation fur them.
doesn't matter, they will do it anyways. they drew femcel like that and i never once brought up my objections to them doing so befurehand

>>88845
Yea but asking them not to only encourages them. I'm not saying it's good or justified, that's just how people there are. The best thing you can do is to not engage

>>88850
>The best thing you can do is to not engage
that's basically what i did, i just didn't reply to anyone after that image

ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (131.4KB, 393x369)
Reverse

>>88843
>he wasn't lying

>>88852
i need to start a video game company based in japan so that way i can DMCA anyone drawing things i don't like of my characters

>>88843
Damn. They beat me to it. Albeit I wasn't going to draw anything explicit, just 'toon with exaggerated tits to elicit a reaction.

>>88859
From whom?

>>88861
probably me

>>88594
>pornography has negatively imacted me yet i stay on site with pornography

>>88864
esl nyaggas be like:

>>88865
Like what?

1768661600277i.webp U A
[Hide] (889.5KB, 255x233)
Reverse

>>88866
like you

f7135c6ee1a93535ec82890cb961b599a07d85010051963dd1558c5abc997046.jpg U A
[Hide] (724.6KB, 2048x2048)
Reverse

>>88864
>>88865

>>88843
>>88852
nyagga its just two circles
goofcacas have no standards

>>88859
You know, nothing is stopping you from doing that now, and I don't think anybody would contest 
>>88869
I'm sorry yure too gay to understand why a huge dragon ass is peak

>Kevin skinwalking mi.

Princess_pepe.jpg U A
[Hide] (33KB, 422x750)
Reverse

>>88871
>>88873
ur both fags lel

>>88871
Is peak what?

>>88871
She's right

>>88878
Not the fluffing saggy tits cause she’s old 🥀

>>88878
Not a pretty picture.

>>88878
Yes a pretty picture.

>>88878
Breasts are very sad but if the joke is that she's a hag who has saggers then it's pretty funny

ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (447.9KB, 1298x2048)
Reverse

>>88822
>check'd
I have to ask.  Catholic nun or Orthodox nun?

>>88917
catholic i think? i did not save the entire image

beaf01f32a9f2891429509d0869638045ff19e7d5f4ecf2d7f1cebcf93968028.png U A
[Hide] (3.2MB, 1903x1005)
Reverse

>>88892
>saggers
>>88918
Draw her as an Orthodox nun, then, making the Look of Disapproval ಠ_ಠ at the viewer and post it in /ic/ as a response, then.

>>88919
1. that is a terrible idea
2. this incident happened like over a year ago

>>88920
Isn't the Look of Disapproval her default expression?  Some would say that's normal fur nuns anyway.

I'm not attempting to offend.  The idea just amuses me.

>>88922
maybe. i'm just not going to try to stir shit on a general that already hates me and has drawn porn of my oc in the past

>>88917
>>88918
fur the record, she wasn't wearing a nun outfit, just a sweater and a cross pendant

>>88925
actually i think you are correct, i just may have misremembered her exact outfit, as i was not trying to spend a lot of time looking at it. also GO BACK TO /IC/

4e4ef86c4b9c50e6884c73b434f685babf869ce773a6c3f45eb29ac80b353efa.png U A
[Hide] (301KB, 1705x959)
Reverse

>>88924

>>88926
I'd rather stay here. It's better

>>88928
>Fureigners in my sekret klub…

>>88928
true

>>88843
As with many things I believe the best defense against that is to not share your characters in spaces where this can happen, ie 4chan and to a lesser extent twitter

>>88878
saggy breasts kino

>>88944
To be entirely fair, putting anything on the Internet anywhere makes it at least possible that someone will do something with it that you don't like.  Restricting it to places like this is unlikely to prevent it furever.  Some people who don't even care about the pr0n aspects might do it just to wind you up, "fur the lulz."  

I try not to worry about things I can't affect.  The alternative is to leave behind the Internet, movies, television, and radio, and live in a cave without electricity.

>>88950
Which is why you want to limit the possibility of your creations coming into contact with such people

43fbd3afeed1fac50d1b51c3fb9819c9c2239f26604de590b997b10004975f80.png U A
[Hide] (459.9KB, 1200x720)
Reverse

>>88951
They can't do inappropriate things with my creations if I don't create anything.

>>88951
All bets are off the moment your characters leave the confines of your mind.

>>88955
True, though you can still take steps to reduce eventual negative effects by keeping your character niche and not trying to go fur mass appeal

>Do you ever consider drawing NSFW? Why it why not?

Nintendo can't shut down Mario porn and you think you can shut down porn of your OC?

8e5699111e291c4753778a704fdf130b21176418de0021d9791d0c2f44b20430.png U A
[Hide] (10KB, 214x177)
Reverse

>>88961
>because it bores the catgirl

>>88962
Cygames can keep Western art (insert quotation marks around that word as you see fit) of Umamusume in check well enough, it seems.

ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (10.1KB, 261x50)
Reverse

>>88966
Huh?

>>88967 
Well enough that all I see in regards to it is artists complaining about getting cease-and-desists.

>>88962
You can't shut it down once it exists, the only thing you can do is try to prevent it from ever being made in the first place

>>88967
You can't spell "umamusume" without "amuse."  Just saying. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMBQrOa0ioE

>>88888

>>88822
I don't mind this sort of thing, but the kinda hardcore / fetish shit sucks... Literally.

>>89330
then you are either a normie or a goofer! all jokes aside, i do not like watching other people use my characters fur peverted purposes. i guess its a little similar to a father not wanting her daughter to do onlyfans, albiet less severe (although your mileage may vary depending on the artist). femcel is almost supposed to be a cautionary tale of what sexual abuse and degeneracy can create

>>89386
Daughterdads are nig-GEEEERRRR pig slaves and you should aspire to think and be as little like them as possible.

>>89390
andrew tate has rotted your brain. you should care about your offspring regardless of if they are male or female

>>89392
tsmt
just another reason why we need feminism
this manosphere stuff has gone on fur far too long

>>89392
femcelanon, how are you celebrating Martin Luther King Jr. (PBUH) Day?

>>89392
}Andrew Tate out of nowhere
Whaaaaaaat? /neutralpepe

cc95c00804075c5c4464d7ee9025f43571ce152686352dda7ceebc2de51687b6.png U A
[Hide] (13.4KB, 657x527)
Reverse

>>89395

undah da knee.jpg U A
[Hide] (41.2KB, 500x500)
Reverse

>>89393
we don't need feminism either. i think feminism back to 1st wave feminism was a bad idea
>>89394
i furgot it was martin looter king day. i am celebrating by shitposting on a serbian fur coat enthusiast web furum and either drawing or watching youtubeslop
>>89395
okay, is ethan ralph more your speed?

>>89397
No, he's not. I don't really know where you got that one from either.
>>89396
Don't do that.

28917 - SoyBooru.png U A
[Hide] (82.3KB, 450x459)
Reverse

>>89400
well i congratulate you on not being a deadbeat who looks up to ecelebs, but rather a deadbeat who does not look up to ecelebs

>>89402
Okay.

>>89403
not okay

>>89404
Fur whom?

>>89407
>>89407
>>89407
>>89407

>>89430
Well it obviously is axiomatically OK fur me.

>>88699
>>88703
I always appreciate it when people are interested enough to make a request, even if it is something like this

d68452dc90a6acd2ffa43eb16df3167ba56bac5f0e3f630c241ee519ccbe2e96.png U A
[Hide] (888KB, 1280x720)
Reverse

>>89402
This business will get out of control.  It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it.

Also, now draw her getting an education.

Well, this clears up a bit. I'm still rather mad about that Deer comic you did a while ago, though.

>>89527
Huh?

>>89527
What deer comic?

>>89528
>>89537
Nufurs....

>>88587 (OP) 
The pro gamer move is to draw every character naked in full detail and then put the clothes as a seperate removable layer on top so that you draw NSFW and SFW at the same time

>>89397
without feminism women would still be poisoning their husbands to death

>>89538
Tbh I am a retard
>>89527 was meant fur >>88594
Now I really don't like him given his other stances.

>>89603
get a wife that doesn't hate you
>>89609
wdym? did my anti-hmofa comic already net me 1 hater?

>>89614
If you don't remember it then it's not really that important. I might draw Cletus with a gator wife but that's really all that'll come of it.
I didn't really think much of it until you started saying people can only be happy one way and I think that makes fur a shit setting.

>>89614
>get a wife that doesn't hate you
21 January 2026. We live in 21 January 2026.

>>89621
Waow.. 21st of January 2026.. so many resources at the touch of our fingertips to grow and improve as a person physically, mentally and in interpersonal relationships.. yeen wife im coming fur you!

>>89623
Ehhhhhhhhhhh yep.

2f60ca3af66b93550275a3fab9f3ac9cf0c12ac854d20adfaa42d6068ddafc5e.png U A
[Hide] (16.9KB, 600x700)
Reverse

>>89615
I like hmofa and it doesn't bother me that some people here dislike it. The comics femcelanon makes are funny as hell even if it's just my self insert hanging from a ceiling, loosen up a little

how2fennec.png U A
[Hide] (261.5KB, 640x640)
Reverse

>>89640
I blame Femcelanon because his characters are too cute.  It's all his fault.  Pic completely unrelated.

>>89615
well i don't know what else you expected from a white-nationalist. i like anthro women and think they can be hot, but they are not the ideal if you are not the same species
>I might draw Cletus with a gator wife
go ahead. unless its porn i dont mind people drawing my ocs
>>89621
i'm fully aware that modern women are mostly trash, but if you neat to constantly beat your wife to get her to behave, you probably shouldn't have married her
>>89640
this guy gets it. i have gotten along with hmofa people befure, and my distaste fur them is only partially serious. though i don't know if that's because anthro women aren't real
>>89657
why thank you!

>>89698
The simplest and autisticest way would be whether you would object to cross-speces relations in a world where it wasn't possible fur humans to become anthros or vice versa.
Honestly your humor is similar to mine minus the death, but I like the idea of losers finding peace love and happiness through their shared loserdom to be peak. Maybe that's just not compatible with yours.

>>89447
built fur intense belly kneading sessions

>>89698
white nationalism is retard, its main leader is a gay Mexican

>>89698
I don't see what beating wives has to do with any of this.

>>89720
no that's christian nationalism, you dumb dumb

>>89713
>The simplest and autisticest way would be whether you would object to cross-speces relations in a world where it wasn't possible fur humans to become anthros or vice versa.
i think same-sex marriage is wrong, and you cannot change your sex, so i think it would be fair my standards would still apply
>I like the idea of losers finding peace love and happiness through their shared loserdom to be peak
look, i get it. i was probably pro-hmofa at some point too. hmofa is a fantasy fur losers about finding the perfect woman, and i'm kinda like that too. its just that i would rather ship characters of the same species, because that opens them up to being able to have children, and aligns with my personal beliefs of course!
i had an OC that was originally going to fall in love with a human, but i decided to have her fall in love with a member of her own species. and i remember anons on 4chan saying i cucked myself and that i couldn't even get drawings of women to love me (so true!)
>>89720
woah, i guess it would really suck if i didn't know who tf you were talking about and didn't discredit an entire idea because some drama whores misrepresent it
>>89726
i was referencing the other anon, who i think his point was that women had to poison their husbands because they could be beaten by their husbands befure feminism stopped it or something i dunno

>>89720
>>89737
oh you mean fuentes? yeah he's a gay mexican, but im not sure if he's pro-ethnostate or not. i don't really watch him, but it feels like if he was he went back on it somewhat

>>89738
>its just that i would rather ship characters of the same species, because that opens them up to being able to have children
Yeah see this isn't gonna work because in my autism interbreeding works fine.

>>89738
>hmofa is a fantasy fur losers about finding the perfect woman
Is this supposed to be an attack on having standards and not SETTLING DOWN with your LOOKSMATCH? Either way, that isn't what motivates my personal interest in the concept so basically you're wrong furever about everything.
>because that opens them up to being able to have children
They're not real [yet], so I don't see what reason you have fur choosing to believe this.

SoyBooru.com - 113128 - judy_hopps nick_wilde series_i_love_my_hybrid_grandson subvariant_gapejak_female variant_cobson variant_gapejak variant_impish_soyak_ears variant_shirtjak zootopia.png U A
[Hide] (941.8KB, 2004x1500)
Reverse

>>89742
they gon have mutt babies doe

>>89743
>Is this supposed to be an attack on having standards and not SETTLING DOWN with your LOOKSMATCH?
no?????? i have high standards fur women, and there's nothing wrong with that. my point is that most men don't fantasize about anthro women, we are some level of loser/weirdo on an obscure website discussing things around a niche topic
>They're not real [yet], so I don't see what reason you have fur choosing to believe this.
well i guess it depends on your lore, but i imagine the genome fur an anthropomorphic fox is very different to that of a human

>>89744
A lot of the story is about that. Her best friend is a hybrid that got bullied a lot fur it, though the main character's line is generally pure.
The thing you wouldn't like is it explores the idea of cultures kind of being unable to adapt to the times and that some individuals would start to question why they're continuing to put up with certain borderline abusive practices because of their species.

>>89746
In that case, it'd make more sense to not use such morally-charged, value-judging language.

boop alert.png U A
[Hide] (227.7KB, 571x552)
Reverse

>>89748

>>89748
i would say go fur it. even though i might make a few quadroon jokes, you should still create works you are passionate about
>borderline abusive practices because of their species
some cultures are inferior to others. however i see a lot of attacks on tradition to stem from hedonism and greed, so i am skeptical of a lot of "changing of the times" over tradition arguments
>>89749
boo hoo nyagga nyagger negroid negroid nyaggershitwad, i'm gonna judge yo values nigguh
>>89752
i immediately thought of the buffalo shooter when i saw this image

>>89754
wtf do you even mean you're a wignat thats such a ridiculously ambiguous term. If you're just after an ethno state its a ridiculous task in ambiguity. I've heard the origin of america as a "pan european" state but that wouldnt make it an ethno state unless you consider italians white. Even within the group you may call white there is distinct separate cultures so you wouldn't get a homogeneous state by just saying "white". If your end goal is a peaceful society why are slavs excluded? What about japs?

>>89743
faggot

>>89778
Hey yung lean! I really love rivers of another town make more thx!

>>89754
That's true fur sure. I just don't like people kind of pigeonholing their settings to where something like "only anthro x anthro or hmofa happens". Obviously doesn't apply to main characters. There's also a lot of fun speciesim you can do, like certain pairings having different stereotypes about them. More or less saying that keeping a world to only your ideals makes it feel flat, since worlds generally aren't perfect. I get it'd be easy to be called a cuck because of the "I changed my couple to an anthro X anthro" stuff but I wouldn't shy away from flawed characters getting into "flawed" relationships either.

j4zvo77fqdeg1.jpg U A
[Hide] (17.9KB, 440x498)
Reverse

Prudery turns media boring and people neurotic, there is literally no benefit to it

>>89386
I think I've just got some sorta innate appreciation of sex, is all... And yeah, trust me, I get the feeling! All too much... R34 pisses me off sometimes. Like your work, cool to learn some about it. :)

>>89778
Yung Lean wouldn't say that.
>>89782
You haven't really made a very good case fur why people should create fictional worlds they personally find unappealing and uncompelling. What, I have to make my idealised fantasy scenarios as shit and rotten as this world because it's not hardcore survival realism ummm echo chambers ummmm imagine in a cocky teenage latina duck caught you wanting things to be different?
>keeping a world to only your ideals makes it feel flat
Maybe if you're a stupid, puerile, flat person yourself. This is not a rule of "goodworldbuildingdesign".

>>89782
>More or less saying that keeping a world to only your ideals makes it feel flat
If he is only doing it fur fun, then it really doesn't matter. Unless he plans on creating an actual story. In that case, it would matter because a story is generally uninteresting if all the characters are one note stereotypes and everything is just the author's idealized reality. Then there are no stakes or reasons fur anyone to get invested if there are no nuances.

>>89792
That depends on the story and feeling the author is attempting. A world like, fur example, "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" would have ridiculous and unbelievable "lore" fur a gritty space opera. But the author is to writing a comedy, so it works fur that setting. "Lord of the Rings" and "A Song of Ice and Fire" are both "fantasy" stories, but their tone is much different, and so their worlds are built quite differently from each other.

>>89804
erm... but shadiversity told me all worldbuilding (tm) must be hyperrealistic all of the time, otherwise people may furm heckin' historical misconceptions and such!!!

>>89809
Literally who

I sometimes think about drawing nsfw stuff however, I really like drawing stupid stuff and perhaps some really cool shit I can think of. 
Which kind of gets me conflicted on whether or not I should just pick a lane and stay on it.

>>89827
Draw whatever you want. Unless you make money off it the only person you do it fur is yourself.

>>89809
I thought "hyperrealism" didn't mean "really really realistic."  It meant "in people's minds this fictional representation is ranked higher than the real thing," like successful propaganda.

I only do it in private or when I get paid fur it.

>>88587 (OP) 
i have considered and disconsidered it fur commercial purposes. honestly, to me doing porn art always felt kinda grift-y, but in this fluffed up economy and society, who cares

if it's fur myself... i don't know, i don't see the point. i can just AIslop it, or just hire a hooker instead of jorking it to my own characters

>>89833
Maybe, but I meant it as "really, really realistic".

>>89393
The manosphere is just another wing of feminism. 
But then again, me and no one here has any credibility.