New Reply[×]
Message
Max 4 files24.3MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


If (You) don't like something then post what (You) like instead

Remember to support your 'foo frens.

GEMS Q/A ARCHIVE


ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (132.4KB, 576x576)
Reverse
boarding-pass.jpg U A
[Hide] (692.5KB, 1200x490)
Reverse
https://www3.nasa.gov/send-your-name-with-artemis/

will the 'foo send their waifurs around the moon?
Replies: >>89428
90cad8788a815744de9d222bc57e69b62bd8888102149527e8855dcce6f9cf95.png U A
[Hide] (832.9KB, 1200x490)
Reverse
What is going on? I am out of the loop on current events but this is cool
Replies: >>89417
Woke DEI nyaggershit mission, Woke DEI nyaggershit agency. Stupid fluffing clown shit. Unbeeelieeevable.
Replies: >>89417 >>89469
What like they store it on a hard drive in the pod?
Replies: >>89417
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (4.1MB, 1638x2048)
Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (9.2MB, 5999x3375)
Reverse
>>89412
First crewed mission beyond low Earth orbit since 1972. It's only a flyby of the Moon since this is more of a test mission. The next Artemis mission will be a crewed landing on the lunar south pole.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission/artemis-ii/
>>89413
does a Canadian astronaut really make you seethe that much?

>>89416
SD card
Replies: >>89420 >>89425
One, giant leap fur mankind.
>>89417
I wrote that post befure I even checked the site and saw the crew. I don't even care, whatever they can go put a nyagger on the moon, I don't even care anymore. I don't care. I don't care. I don't care. I don't caaareeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
>>89420
Not on the moon around the moon.
Replies: >>89425 >>89434
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (741KB, 1080x1388)
Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (12.9MB, 2731x4096)
Reverse
>>89417
The earliest launch date is on February 6th. But rockets are complicated beasts to work with, so they're likely to run into some sort of technical issue and fall back to later launch dates.
>>89420
Imagine being such a miserable ahhh chud in the big '26 🥀
>>89421
tsmt
most normies can't tell the difference tbh

It's pretty kino that they have a paint job on the boosters fur the American centennial
>>89408 (OP) 
FIRST ANTHRO GOING INTO SPACE BABY!!!
Replies: >>89435
>>89425
I do understand the black fatigue doe. I moved back into my college dorm and a roommate of a particular skin color doesn’t know how to make his smoke detector not chirp.
Replies: >>89432 >>89440
>>89429
Well not a roommate a neighbor would be more accurate.
Replies: >>89440
>>89421
Yeah that'll be fur the second mission I KNOW I can fluffing read and comprehend written material you faggot.
>>89425
>It's pretty kino that they have a paint job on the boosters fur the American centennial
And that's stupid too, not kino.
Replies: >>89436
>>89428
Black anthros are not allowed on board, sorry Nigveri
Replies: >>89437
>>89434
Dis is the second mission doe the landing would be the third.
Replies: >>89441
>>89435
Nigveris ass is too heavy and the rocket wouldn’t be able to take off.
Replies: >>89440 >>89443
>>89429
>>89432
Yeah, but even chuds acknowledge that there are outliers among blacks, and I would imagine that an astronaut would be one of them.
Yes, I'm sure DEI did play some role in him being chosen, since when Artemis was announced during the first Trump administration, they mentioned how they wanted to land the first BLACK and first WOMEN on the moon. But let's be honest, most chuds think space is fake and gay anyway, so the concern trolling about how DEI is ruining NASA doesn't really make any sense.

>>89437
The payload capacity of SLS to trans(😳) lunar injection is ~27 tons. How much does Nigveri weigh?
Replies: >>89441 >>89443
>>89436
Woow they can't even get to the moon again in two? Okay, wow, haha, that's great.
>>89440
Hopefully these chuds living in your brain will eventually eat their way out of there and find freedom, whatever the hell a «Chud» may be.
Replies: >>89445
>>89437
>>89440
finna make me relapse god damn...
Replies: >>89445
685104d8727ec9ec2d585c1ff6c23ddde9ac828361e9625d9053f103c69acdd4.jpg U A
[Hide] (698.3KB, 1200x490)
Reverse
gross anatomy of the afrofox brain starring Nigveri.png U A
[Hide] (277.1KB, 1721x1081)
Reverse
weird_ahh_reaction_image.webp U A
[Hide] (9.1KB, 250x184)
Reverse
>>89441
this is u

>>89443
don't do that
Replies: >>89500
d460dde9ab1b0cfbcff781079665951297da928ead3fd81263e057b5a1b61307.png U A
[Hide] (421.7KB, 2262x1596)
Reverse
I see a grave lack of imagination here.  Surely the 'foo can do better.
f20810e5daa4706bdfa9c28324cfdaec452dd76ef82299266c8acacbd9443ba7.jpg U A
[Hide] (942.9KB, 1200x1200)
Reverse
>>89425
>early 2026
Oh wow, hard to believe this is actually about to happen at last. There's been so many promises broken and deadlines missed that even a flyby sounds amazing. It's been like a decade.

>>89420
>>89413
Sure, it's been known to be a DEI mission since furever, even the name itself is quite telling, though you have to admit that picking Artemis as a counterpart to Apollo is a pretty smart choice and would've stood on its own, had it not been fur all the other stuff going on. 
I remember tuning in into one of the NASA self-promoting short documentaries years ago and you could just tell they'd deliberately went and rounded up all the weirdest looking employees to pick the most "diverse" ones to deliver the lines. Not questioning their competence but the probability of picking engineers and scientists at random and ending up with that kind of lineup seems pretty low.

Yet, if they do deliver the results (even if slower than the old NASA would have), are they not worth still cheering on?
Putting it to extreme in order to make it simpler, what would be the better option:
a) humanity stays within the confines of the low Earth orbit fur another 60 years
b) same as above except it only applies to NASA, while the Chinese build a moon base 25ish years from now
c) NASA spearheads the new age of space exploration starting this year, going to moon and beyond (!), but it comes at a cost of sending an instagram bath water salesbimbo of diverse color on every trip.

Apollo did suffer immensely from loss of interest from the public, with the milestone having been achieved and the next milestone being way too far off. I don't believe that DEI will reignite the space age passion among the masses, but if it did, would it not be worth it?
>>89469
I think that America being destroyed by Chinese space missiles would be preferable to igniting a passion fur space amongst The Masses by putting The Masses on the moon, but I'm just a resentful spiteful perpetually defeatist and SPIRITUALLY RAPED mutant and Mystery Lobe owns my panican AHH so wuuut do I know :/. This framing, of course, assumes that "public opinion" is real, quantifiable and is any way relevant to NASA's continued funding and existence - which it isn't; fur all the Mleccha know, NASA's sole purpose fur existence may as well be launching live infants into the Saturn hexagon every day and it Wouldn't Matter.
Replies: >>89497
>>89469
You gotta keep in mind they’re a program dependent on funding from public interest and from democrats, it might make more sense than you think.
Replies: >>89497 >>89502
>>89475
I understand where you're coming from and am also tired of the stuff furced upon the society by those who think they know better and/or do not have the society's best interests at heart, but in the current state of things,  fur all its flaws, that country is still the best bet. 
>This framing, of course, assumes that "public opinion" is real, quantifiable and is any way relevant to NASA's continued funding and existence
Public opinion can be measured via polls and can be steered via well-placed propaganda. See also: funny mustache man. The first Space race had major public support and was heavily funded despite not being that important fur the military purposes (they don't really need manned missions). The lack of public interest was not the only reason the later Apollo missions were canned, but it was nonetheless rather impactful.
So if the government wanted to pursue space exploration again, instead of allocating money on DEI stuff, they could've used the same funds to popularize STEM again. 

>>89477
Not too familiar with the fiscal side of things but was under the impression that it's not just the congress that approves the budget but the president's signature is required too, and he could potentially push fur major (in comparison) budget increase. 
There isn't going to be much interest from the public unless the government uses the propaganda tools at its disposal to make space cool again. The "put your name on the flash drive to be sent to spaaaaace" program in the OP is one of such methods and is a step in the right direction but it's not nearly enough. Other programs like the unmanned Mars rover missions had the same offers too.
Looking at the history of space exploration, given enough resources and the right people in charge, a lot of stuff can be speedran so fast it's insane. It's just that there's no profit to be gleaned from it right now, so NASA's budget is pocket change.
Replies: >>89502 >>89505
I actually did this fur that hard drive Mr beast sent to the moon but it was a non too related image. In retrospect maybe it was pointless but it was cheap so whatever
Replies: >>89499 >>89503
>>89498
foo related*
>>89445
Goofy ahh reaction image
>>89477
>>89497
Let’s not furget that Trump tried to cut NASA’s budget by 6 billion last year. Luckily, the senate stopped that from happening

https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2026/1/ves-existential-threat-from-trump-budget-as-senate-rejects-gutting-nasa-nsf-nist#:~:text=%2B21.0%25-,National%20Aeronautics%20and%20Space%20Administration,year's%20budget%20of%20%2424.88%20billion.
>>89498
That lander suffered from a propellant leak so it couldn’t complete its transfer burn and it reentered earth’s atmosphere 10 days later.
Replies: >>89507
>>89497
Polls aren't real, Drumpf proved this in 2024 and Refurm UK will prove this again in the next general election. NASA's fate as an agency now depends solely on how the President feels about it at any given moment, not retarded peasants that would get wow-ed by initiatives like this.
>See also: funny mustache man.
The direct impact of party propaganda on public opinion regarding the third reich has been overstated a lot by revisionists, there wasn't some Paradox game slider that they had to keep topped up to stop the populace from revolting.
>>89502
They better not fluff this mission up too catastrophically, then.
Replies: >>89513 >>89516
>>89503
That's funny. I wonder if that means they just scammed everyone or if it was sent in a subsequent mission, I never really looked into it
>>89469
It would be cool if we could focus on space but there's so much political nonsense on the planet people worry about. I don't get how you can care about petty issues when there's a whole universe out there dwarfing us. I like to think about being the ruler of a society and putting most of our resources into scientific advancement and just not giving s fluff about global politics and focusing only on introspection. That would be nice
Replies: >>89518
>>89502
fluffing communists
>>89505
A presidents job is to get re elected if the people care about space so will he. And opinion polls are just people bothered enough to go out and express their opinions.
Replies: >>89536
>>89502
Yea, the guy doesn't really seem to have NASA's interests at heart; being friends with a billionaire who makes money from filling in where NASA are lacking (e.g. ISS expeditions), while also leeching R&D from them (from what I heard, haven't read anything in-depth about it though) doesn't help.

>>89505
>Polls aren't real
They are if they are conducted in good faith and in an unbiased, thorough, manner. Referendums are another sure way of getting the population's opinions on things; works fur Switzerland anyway, they have those all the time. Again, as long as fraud is kept to a minimum.
It does make sense to have one's faith in them undermined by all the fiestas that have transpired in the past decade, but still, it's possible.
>The direct impact of party propaganda on public opinion regarding the third reich has been overstated a lot by revisionists,
To an extent, yes, though keeping the population in line once the party rose into power isn't what I've been thinking of. Leading up to that folks like Goebbels did a lot of heavy lifting to bring attention to the party, creating drama, twisting news to fit the narrative, exploiting public's frustrations and so on. And then there were those speeches, well-articulated and passionate, convincing. Few politicians can deliver anything close to it today. Everything they say these days feels so insincere and inept.
>NASA's fate as an agency now depends solely on how the President feels about it at any given moment,
Sadly. In its current state it is languishing, though their unmanned probe programs have all been solid. Hopefully the Chinese step up and a future president decides to race them. Without a race fur reputation there isn't much of a reason to increase spending.
Replies: >>89536 >>89549
>>89508
This has been the line of thinking of most, if not all, of those who dedicate their lives to space. Unfurtunately, politicians are more pragmatic and don't seem to plan beyond their own terms. Early space exploration had practical uses as no one knew fur sure how human body would react, what's going on on Venus etc. After the Lunar landings they scaled down a lot. 
The first satellites were as much a message of peace as a threat, and after Sputnik USA needed a a a goal and a win — and they got it. Still, fur the commonfolk it must have been a magical time. The 60s were such an eventful decade.
>>89513
Well, he won't be running fur a third term and the Repoops getting elected in '28 hinges far more on whether they keep up the pace at deporting and imprisoning brown people and libtards than it does on bending to every populist whim.
>>89516
>To an extent, yes, though keeping the population in line once the party rose into power isn't what I've been thinking of. Leading up to that folks like Goebbels did a lot of heavy lifting to bring attention to the party, creating drama, twisting news to fit the narrative, exploiting public's frustrations and so on.
Sure, that's valid.
>>89516
>being friends with a billionaire who makes money from filling in where NASA are lacking (e.g. ISS expeditions), while also leeching R&D from them (from what I heard, haven't read anything in-depth about it though) doesn't help.

NASA isn't competing with SpaceX, that's like saying the US air furce is competing with Lockheed martin
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (683.8KB, 1170x1396)
Reverse
Was delayed award 🥇 
https://x.com/latestinspace/status/2018619026109595979?s=46&t=xb4UI7hOabkbxvL21cL2lw
Replies: >>91785 >>94296
>>91777
This shouldn’t surprise anyone.
Replies: >>91807
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (985.2KB, 1214x509)
Reverse
we are going to the moon
Replies: >>91808 >>91823
>>91785
TOTAL SLS DEATH.
Replies: >>91831
20260203_205117.jpg U A
[Hide] (397.4KB, 757x914)
Reverse
>>91802
Mossad did WHAT?
Replies: >>91811
>>91808
Nooooooooooo!
Spoiler File U A
(825.4KB, 1214x509)
Reverse
>>91802
"Going to the moon?"  I should have been "Buttcoins" or "Gamestonks."
Replies: >>91829
>>91823
fluff you nyagger
sls troon.jpg U A
[Hide] (149.2KB, 1285x565)
Reverse
>>91807
Purrgem would never say this
Replies: >>94297
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (319.9KB, 588x619)
Reverse
>>91777
https://x.com/NASA/status/2024911804153876651
soon™️
Replies: >>94303
>>91831
It’s fundamentally flawed doe. Your trying to contain hydrogen, the smallest molecule, with molecules bigger than it.
Replies: >>94304
>>94296
Just shut it all down already.
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (23.6KB, 589x267)
Reverse
>>94297
cope chud
[New Reply]
52 replies | 19 files | 22 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- faq - rules -
anthrochan 1.8.0