I think this endeavor has suffered from possibly just a lack of time on everyone's part & maybe just a lack of interest generally. However, I think there's also a lack of executive action. But I also think we want to keep this as decentralized & leaderless as possible. Thus, I've created this charter establishing a decisionmaking mechanism. Obviously, rules only matter if they're respected and I recognize the infurmal nature of this endeavor. Therefure, many of these rules hinge upon common sense & leave much up to "reason". It may be used fur both executive & legislative decisionmaking but there is no "judicial" enfurcement system. That's intentional. That way there's some breathing space & room fur interpretation. This way, rules like stylistic guidelines may be occasionally broken without any fuss. This is primarily meant to allow fur disputes & large decisions to be handled gracefully & democratically. If all is agreed, then:
1. All participants are allowed to open or reopen a reasonable issue (qualm, dispute, or request) at any moment.
2. Issues are labeled with sequential issue numbers & recorded.
3. Propositions may be made, rescinded, edited, or merged during a reasonable window of time immediately after the issue is opened.
4. Once the proposition window is closed, propositions are to be compiled & labeled with the corresponding issue number & a sequential letter, then recorded.
5. Once all propositions are compiled & labeled, the voting window opens fur a reasonable amount of time.
6. In addition to all propositions, a void option shall always be included, allowing an issue to be closed without resolution.
7. If only one proposition is compiled, the poll shall be allowed to be a simple majority vote. Otherwise, Condorcet voting shall be used.
8. Permanent provisions enacted shall be recorded in a modifiable Code.
9. Propositions may alter, add to, or subtract from these Rules.