>>101581
So, all "ideologies" are Gnosticism because they presuppose that reality can be (re-)manifested to conform to the will/mind of its perceivers, against the wishes of some nebulous "oppressor" class? Drawing Woke into a long continuity of para-Gnosticism because it - along with every other popular ideology - shares a few base structural presuppositions seems like unnecessary mysticism and obfuscation, daresay, capeshit. If you think that you can compete with the troon rabbis on metaphysics pilpul, go ahead, but the Useful Idiots (attributed to Lenin, but in use long before the Dr Strangelove-affecting TV man did) will not renounce their faith once you own the Landian philosopher-troons.
Most people are affected by transsexuality and Queer Theory as a sociological and mass psychosis phenomenon whose grounds were laid by material factors (there was no other easily accessible space that would accept young people with emotions and interority who weren't willing to destroy them for the sake of normalfagdom except the online "queer" monoculture), not as a religious awakening. Maybe those are its conceptual roots, but arguing about that now is like a Jew in 1930s Germany confronting the SA kids who've come to smash up his storefront about how the NSDAP's views originated from WW1 resentment and the material conditions of the Weimar years.
